May 3, 2013

A systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis of specialist services and adrenaline auto-injectors in anaphylaxis

Research type:

HTA Technology Assessment Report 

Title (lead author) etc:

A systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis of specialist services and adrenaline auto-injectors in anaphylaxis  (Armstrong) 117 pages, Volume 17, number 17

DOI

10.3310/hta17170
|  View/print executive summary
|  View/print abstract
|  View full text in pdf format (604 KB)
|  ;How to order


 

Headline:

Study found a lack of good data to inform the effectiveness of anaphylaxis intervention but concluded that both referral to a specialist service (SS) and prescription of adrenaline injectors are likely to be cost-effective, and so consideration of randomised controlled trials of the components of care in SSs was recommended. 

This report should be referenced as follows:

Armstrong N, Wolff R, van Mastrigt G, Martinez N, Hernandez A, et al. A systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis of specialist services and adrenaline auto-injectors in anaphylaxis. Health Technol Assess 2013;17(17).

Project ref:

10/158/01 

Original project title:

Anaphylaxis: assessment to confirm an anaphylactic episode and the decision to refer after emergency treatment for a suspected anaphylactic episode. 

Chief Investigator:

Kleijnen Systematic Reviews Ltd (KSR), Kleijnen Systematic Reviews Ltd  

Start Date:

February 2011  

Date of publication in HTA journal series

April 2013

Cost:

 This project was commissioned by the HTA programme on a call-off contract basis.

Project Protocol:

Project protocol (pdf format, 198 kbytes)

Printed copies of this title despatched:

0 (Figures relate to the previous calendar month)

URL of this page:

http://www.hta.ac.uk/2486


No comments:

Post a Comment