- Marie-Christine Dombret1,8,
- Khuder Alagha2,8,
- Louis Philippe Boulet3,
- Pierre Yves Brillet4,
- Guy Joos5,
- Michel Laviolette3,
- Renaud Louis6,
- Thierry Rochat7,
- Paola Soccal7,
- Michel Aubier1 and
- Pascal Chanez2⇑
+Author Affiliations
- Pascal Chanez, Dept of Respiratory Medicine, Marseille Public Hospitals, INSERM U1067 CNRS UMR 7333, Aix Marseille University, Hôpital Nord, 13015 Marseille, France. E-mail: pascal.chanez@univ-amu.fr
- Abstract
Bronchial thermoplasty is a young yet promising treatment for severe asthma whose benefit for long-term asthma control outweighs the short-term risk of deterioration and hospitalisation in the days following the treatment. It is an innovative treatment whose clinical efficacy and safety are beginning to be better understood.
Since this is a device-based therapy, the overall evaluation of risk–benefit is unlike that of pharmaceutical products; safety aspects, regulatory requirements, study design and effect size assessment may be unfamiliar. The mechanisms of action and optimal patient selection need to be addressed in further rigorous clinical and scientific studies. Bronchial thermoplasty fits in perfectly with the movement to expand personalised medicine in the field of chronic airway disorders. This is a device-based complimentary asthma treatment that must be supported and developed in order to meet the unmet needs of modern severe asthma management. The mechanisms of action and the type of patients that benefit from bronchial thermoplasty are the most important challenges for bronchial thermoplasty in the future.This Article
- doi:10.1183/09059180.00005114Eur Respir Rev December 1, 2014 vol. 23 no. 134 510-518
- Free via Open Access: OA
- Free via Creative Commons:CC
- OA Full TextFree
- Full Text (PDF)Free
No comments:
Post a Comment