Copyright©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Co., Limited. All rights reserved.
Florin-Dan Popescu, Department of Allergology, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, “Nicolae Malaxa” Clinical Hospital, Department of Allergology and Clinical Immunology, 022441 Bucharest, Romania
Author contributions: Popescu FD solely contributed to the manuscript.
Correspondence to: Florin-Dan Popescu, MD, PhD, Associate Professor, Department of Allergology, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, “Nicolae Malaxa” Clinical Hospital, Department of Allergology and Clinical Immunology, 022441 Bucharest, Sector 2, Romania. florindanpopescu@ymail.com
Telephone: + 40-21-2555405 Fax: + 40-21-2555275
Received November 23, 2013; Revised January 5, 2014; Accepted February 16, 2014;
Abstract
Grass pollen allergy represents a significant cause of allergic morbidity worldwide. Component-resolved diagnosis biomarkers are increasingly used in allergy practice in order to evaluate the sensitization to grass pollen allergens, allowing the clinician to confirm genuine sensitization to the corresponding allergen plant sources and supporting an accurate prescription of allergy immunotherapy (AIT), an important approach in many regions of the world with great plant biodiversity and/or where pollen seasons may overlap. The search for candidate predictive biomarkers for grass pollen immunotherapy (tolerogenic dendritic cells and regulatory T cells biomarkers, serum blocking antibodies biomarkers, especially functional ones, immune activation and immune tolerance soluble biomarkers and apoptosis biomarkers) opens new opportunities for the early detection of clinical responders for AIT, for the follow-up of these patients and for the development of new allergy vaccines.
Keywords: Biomarkers, Molecular allergy, Grass pollen immunotherapy
|
A blog that publishes updates and open access scientific papers about allergy, asthma and immunology. Editor: Juan Carlos Ivancevich, MD. Specialist in Allergy & Immunology
April 11, 2014
Molecular biomarkers for grass pollen immunotherapy
April 10, 2014
Probiotics as additives on therapy in allergic airway diseases: a systematic review of benefits and risks
BioMed Research International
Volume 2013 (2013), Article ID 231979, 10 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/231979
Review Article
1Department of Pediatrics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar 751019, India
2Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, SCB Medical College, Cuttack 753007, India
3Department of Pediatrics, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh 160012, India
2Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, SCB Medical College, Cuttack 753007, India
3Department of Pediatrics, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh 160012, India
Received 4 April 2013; Accepted 19 June 2013
Academic Editor: Enrico Compalati
Copyright © 2013 Rashmi Ranjan Das et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Abstract
Background. We conducted a systematic review to find out the role of probiotics in treatment of allergic airway diseases. Methods. A comprehensive search of the major electronic databases was done till March 2013. Trials comparing the effect of probiotics versus placebo were included. A predefined set of outcome measures were assessed. Continuous data were expressed as standardized mean difference with 95% CI. Dichotomous data were expressed as odds ratio with 95% CI. P value < 0.05 was considered as significant. Results. A total of 12 studies were included. Probiotic intake was associated with a significantly improved quality of life score in patients with allergic rhinitis (SMD −1.9 (95% CI −3.62, −0.19); P = 0.03), though there was a high degree of heterogeneity. No improvement in quality of life score was noted in asthmatics. Probiotic intake also improved the following parameters: longer time free from episodes of asthma and rhinitis and decrease in the number of episodes of rhinitis per year. Adverse events were not significant. Conclusion. As the current evidence was generated from few trials with high degree of heterogeneity, routine use of probiotics as an additive on therapy in subjects with allergic airway diseases cannot be recommended.
Pruritus in Female Patients
- Biomed Res Int
- v.2014; 2014
- PMC3966341
Biomed Res Int. 2014; 2014: 541867.
Published online Mar 10, 2014. doi: 10.1155/2014/541867
PMCID: PMC3966341
Pruritus in Female Patients
Abstract
Pruritus is a frequent symptom in many dermatological diseases. In this review we want to focus on not only itch problems specific to women, namely, pruritic vulvodermatoses, but also the specific pruritic dermatoses of pregnancy. The specific characteristics of the vulva and the hormonal changes during the different age periods make these dermatoses very particular. It seems that vulvar diseases are still underdiagnosed and undertreated. Pruritic vulvar diseases have a huge impact on quality of life. The most common pruritic diseases will be discussed, such as atopic and contact dermatitis, psoriasis, lichen sclerosis, lichen planus, and infectious vulvaginitis. We focus on the diagnostic issue of these diseases and will consider the general principles of therapy.
Formats:
Evidence - Based Pharmacological Treatment of Atopic Dermatitis: An Expert Opinion and New Expectations
- Indian J Dermatol
- v.59(2); Mar-Apr 2014
- PMC3969672
Indian J Dermatol. 2014 Mar-Apr; 59(2): 140–142.
PMCID: PMC3969672
Evidence - Based Pharmacological Treatment of Atopic Dermatitis: An Expert Opinion and New Expectations
Abstract
Atopic dermatitis (AD) is one of the most common skin diseases with a complex multifactorial background. The clinical presentation, the aggravating factors and the complications vary according to the age of the patients. Most cases, approximately 60-80%, present for the 1st time before the age of 12 months. Adult-onset AD has been observed as a special variant. Pruritus is the worst sign of AD, which also often indicates an exacerbation and is considered to be the most annoying symptom of AD. Treatment is preferably started based on the severity of AD. In only 10% of the cases, AD is so severe that systemic treatment is necessary. Systemic treatment including topical wet-wrap treatment is indicated in the worst and recalcitrant cases of AD. Systemic treatment of AD is discussed with regards to the evidence-based efficacy and safety aspects. I prefer wet-wraps as a crisis intervention in severe childhood cases, whereas UV and systemic treatments are the choices in patients older than 10 years. Probiotics are not useful in the treatment. If they have any effect at all it may only be in food-allergic children with AD. Finally, anti-histamines are not effective against pruritus in AD. They are only effective against urticarial flares and in cases with food-allergy. This article consists of an expert opinion on evidence-based pharmacological treatment of AD, but it is not a systemic review.
Keywords: Atopic dermatitis, evidence-based dermatology, systemic treatment, topical glucocorticoids, wet-wrap treatment
Formats:
Abstract
Atopic dermatitis (AD) is one of the most common skin diseases with a complex multifactorial background. The clinical presentation, the aggravating factors and the complications vary according to the age of the patients. Most cases, approximately 60-80%, present for the 1st time before the age of 12 months. Adult-onset AD has been observed as a special variant. Pruritus is the worst sign of AD, which also often indicates an exacerbation and is considered to be the most annoying symptom of AD. Treatment is preferably started based on the severity of AD. In only 10% of the cases, AD is so severe that systemic treatment is necessary. Systemic treatment including topical wet-wrap treatment is indicated in the worst and recalcitrant cases of AD. Systemic treatment of AD is discussed with regards to the evidence-based efficacy and safety aspects. I prefer wet-wraps as a crisis intervention in severe childhood cases, whereas UV and systemic treatments are the choices in patients older than 10 years. Probiotics are not useful in the treatment. If they have any effect at all it may only be in food-allergic children with AD. Finally, anti-histamines are not effective against pruritus in AD. They are only effective against urticarial flares and in cases with food-allergy. This article consists of an expert opinion on evidence-based pharmacological treatment of AD, but it is not a systemic review.
Keywords: Atopic dermatitis, evidence-based dermatology, systemic treatment, topical glucocorticoids,
Acute urticaria as a side effect of the Mirena(R) (levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system): a case report
Case Report
Xiangjuan Chen, Xueqing Wu and Haiyan Zhu
BMC Research Notes 2014, 7:209 doi:10.1186/1756-0500-7-209
Published: 3 April 2014Abstract (provisional)
Background
The levonorgestrel intrauterine system, Mirena(R), is widely used for contraception and the treatment of idiopathic menorrhagia. Here, we reported one case of acute urticaria following Mirena(R) implantation to increase the awareness of possible adverse side effects associated with Mirena(R).
Case presentation
The case presented is a 27-year-old Chinese woman who received Mirena(R) implantation for her adenomyosis and menorrhagia. The operation was successful and the patient did not experience any discomfort during the operation. However, she developed acute urticaria on her entire body accompanied with pruritic, slight left lower quadrant pain, and slight dizziness two hours after the operation. The patient was recommended to have the Mirena(R) removed immediately, and she took 10 mg oral methylprednisolone and 5 mg desloratadine tablet daily for five days. Her urticaria resolved and did not recur.
Conclusion
The patient's acute urticaria seems to have been associated with the Mirena(R) levonorgestrel intrauterine system implantation, since she had no history of allergic reactions to materials used during the operation such as plastic, metal, alcohol, medications, and povidone-iodine.
The complete article is available as a provisional PDF. The fully formatted PDF and HTML versions are in production.Viewing options |
April 9, 2014
Clinical study of headache in relation to sinusitis and its management
- J Med Life
- v.6(4); Dec 15, 2013
- PMC3973877
J Med Life. Dec 15, 2013; 6(4): 389–394.
Published online Dec 25, 2013.
PMCID: PMC3973877
Clinical study of headache in relation to sinusitis and its management
Abstract
Abstract
Aim: To study relation of headache with sinusitis and its management. Methodology: Patients clinically presenting with headache were selected. Only patients with headache due to rhinogenic causes were subjected to X-ray paranasal sinuses and diagnostic nasal endoscopy and followed-up to evaluate management. Results: Majority of the patients were of age group 21-30 years and it is more predominant in males. Majority of the patients of headache were having DNS (28.9%), acute sinusitis (28.9%), osteomeatal complex disease (24.63%) and few number of patients had nasal polyp (8.69%), allergic rhinitis (5.79%) and rarely patients had atrophic rhinitis (2.89%). Headache was localized in forehead (43.4%), more than one site (34.7%) in majority of cases and few number of patients had headache at glabella (13.04%) and top of head (8.69%). Majority of the patients who underwent antral washout were not relieved, so they underwent functional endoscopic sinus surgery, which gave dramatic results in improving symptoms of patients including headache. Conclusions: Headache is nearly a universal human experience. The lifetime incidence of headache is estimated to be at least 90%. To know whether the headache is sinogenic or not; firstly the patient is clinically assessed, then radiological investigations (X-ray PNS) are done. Role of FESS is huge and ultimately it is it that is the cure for the headache due to rhinogenic causes. Abbreviations: DNE - Diagnostic nasal endoscopy, FESS - Functional endoscopic sinus surgery, PNS - Paranasal sinuses
Keywords: Headache, Sinusitis, FES
Formats:
Role of Gender and Serum Immunoglobulin E (IGE) levels on Severity of Migraine
- J Clin Diagn Res
- v.8(2); Feb 2014
- PMC3972598
J Clin Diagn Res. Feb 2014; 8(2): 57–58.
Published online Feb 3, 2014. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2014/7516.4007
PMCID: PMC3972598
Role of Gender and Serum Immunoglobulin E (IGE) levels on Severity of Migraine
Abstract
Aim: Migraine headache is a common disorders. Several studies have reported that migraine headache is more common in patients with allergy. Aim of this study is to determine if the allergic sensitization is associated with the prevalence, frequency, and disability of migraine headaches.
Materials and Methods: The study was conducted during the period August 2013. During this period 100 patients of either gender who were diagnosed with migraine were selected and total serum Immunoglobulin E (IGE) levels were estimated. Prevalence of migraine headache and degree of allergic sensitization was estimated in these patients. Severity of migraine was assessed using the MIDAS score.
Statistical Analysis : Descriptive tables were generated showing the demographic and clinical characteristics of participants stratified by age and sex. Differences between subject groups were assessed by chi-square test. Correlation between severity of migraine and IgE levels was calculated using Pearson correlation.
Results: A total of 100 patients with migraine who presented to the outpatient department where studied. Prevalence of migraine was found to be higher in females compared to males. At the younger age group IgE levels were higher. Patients with higher levels of IgE had more severe headaches compared to those with lower levels of IgE. Patients with higher levels of IgE required a longer duration of treatment compared to those with lower levels of IgE.
Conclusion: Prevalence of migraine is high among females. Younger age and female sex are other contributory factors as prevalence of migraine is higher in these groups. Degree of allergic sensitisation determines the severity and frequency of headaches in those whom allergic rhinitis is a risk factor as evidenced by higher levels of IgE.
Keywords: Migraine, Allergic sensitisation
Helminths and Immunological Tolerance
- Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Open Access
- PMC3940291
Transplantation
Transplantation. Jan 27, 2014; 97(2): 127–132.
Published online Jan 17, 2014. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e3182a53f59
PMCID: PMC3940291
Helminths and Immunological Tolerance
Abstract
Current immunosuppression regimens for solid-organ transplantation have shown disappointing efficacy in the prevention of chronic allograft rejection and carry unacceptable risks including toxicity, neoplasia, and life-threatening infection. Achievement of immunological tolerance (long-term antigen unresponsiveness in an immunocompetent host) presents the exciting prospect of freedom from immunosuppression for transplant recipients. It is now 60 years since the first demonstration of immunological tolerance in animal models of transplantation, but translation into routine clinical practice remains elusive. Helminth parasites may provide novel strategies toward achieving this goal. Helminths are remarkably successful parasites: they currently infect more than one quarter of the world’s population. It is now well established that the parasites’ success is the result of active immunomodulation of their hosts’ immune response. Although this primarily secures ongoing survival of the parasites, helminth-induced immunomodulation can also have a number of benefits for the host. Significant reductions in the prevalence of allergy and autoimmune conditions among helminth-infected populations are well recognized and there is now a significant body of evidence to suggest that harmful immune responses to alloantigens may be abrogated as well. Here, we review all existing studies of helminth infection and transplantation, explore the mechanisms involved, and discuss possible avenues for future translation to clinical practice.
Keywords: Allograft tolerance, Allograft rejection, Helminth
Abstract
Current immunosuppression regimens for solid-organ transplantation have shown disappointing efficacy in the prevention of chronic allograft rejection and carry unacceptable risks including toxicity, neoplasia, and life-threatening infection. Achievement of immunological tolerance (long-term antigen unresponsiveness in an immunocompetent host) presents the exciting prospect of freedom from immunosuppression for transplant recipients. It is now 60 years since the first demonstration of immunological tolerance in animal models of transplantation, but translation into routine clinical practice remains elusive. Helminth parasites may provide novel strategies toward achieving this goal. Helminths are remarkably successful parasites: they currently infect more than one quarter of the world’s population. It is now well established that the parasites’ success is the result of active immunomodulation of their hosts’ immune response. Although this primarily secures ongoing survival of the parasites, helminth-induced immunomodulation can also have a number of benefits for the host. Significant reductions in the prevalence of allergy and autoimmune conditions among helminth-infected populations are well recognized and there is now a significant body of evidence to suggest that harmful immune responses to alloantigens may be abrogated as well. Here, we review all existing studies of helminth infection and transplantation, explore the mechanisms involved, and discuss possible avenues for future translation to clinical practice.
Keywords: Allograft tolerance, Allograft rejection, Helminth
Formats:
Evolutionary insights into the origin of innate and adaptive immune systems: different shades of grey
Stitaya Sirisinha
Abstract: To struggle for survival, all living organisms, from protists to humans, must defend themselves from attack by predators. From the time when life began around 3,500 million years ago, all living cells have evolved mechanisms and strategies to optimally defend themselves, while the invaders also need to survive by evading these immune defenses. The end results would be healthy co-evolution of both parties. Classically, immune host defense is divided into two main categories, namely, innate and adaptive systems. It is well documented that while vertebrates possess both systems, invertebrates and prokaryotes like bacteria and archaea depend almost exclusively on the innate immune functions. Although the adaptive immune system like antibodies and cellular immunity or their equivalents are believed to have evolved at the time when the vertebrates first appeared about 550 million years ago, more recent information from molecular and genomic studies suggest that different forms of adaptive immune system may also be present in the invertebrates as well. These forms of “adaptive” immune system exhibit, for instance, limited degrees of memory, diversity and similarities of their immune receptors with the immunoglobulin domains of the conventional adaptive immune system of vertebrates. Organized lymphoid tissues have been identified in all vertebrates. Very recent molecular and genetic data further suggest that a special type of adaptive system functioning like RNAi of vertebrates is also present in the very ancient form of life like the bacteria and archaea. In this review, I provide some insights, based on recent information gathering from evolutionary data of innate and adaptive immune receptors of invertebrate and vertebrate animals that should convince the readers that our current view on the innate and adaptive immunity may need to be modified. The distinction between the two systems should not be thought of in terms of a “black and white” phenomenon anymore, as recent molecular and genomic information points to the fact that a line of distinction is not as sharp as it was once thought to be, but it is blurred by different shades of grey.
Full Text: PDF
Chronic Maxillary Rhinosinusitis of Dental Origin: A Systematic Review of 674 Patient Cases
International Journal of Otolaryngology
Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 465173, 9 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/465173
Review Article
Jerome R. Lechien,1,2 Olivier Filleul,1 Pedro Costa de Araujo,1 Julien W. Hsieh,3Gilbert Chantrain,4 and Sven Saussez1,4
1Laboratory of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Faculty of Medicine, UMONS Research Institute for Health Sciences and Technology, University of Mons (UMons), Avenue du Champ de Mars 6, B7000 Mons, Belgium
2Laboratory of Phonetics, Faculty of Psychology, Research Institute for Language Sciences and Technology, University of Mons (UMons), B7000 Mons, Belgium
3Laboratory of Neurogenetics and Behavior, Rockefeller University, 1230 York Avenue, New York City, NY 10065, USA
4Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head, and Neck Surgery, CHU Saint-Pierre, Faculty of Medicine, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), B1000 Brussels, Belgium
2Laboratory of Phonetics, Faculty of Psychology, Research Institute for Language Sciences and Technology, University of Mons (UMons), B7000 Mons, Belgium
3Laboratory of Neurogenetics and Behavior, Rockefeller University, 1230 York Avenue, New York City, NY 10065, USA
4Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head, and Neck Surgery, CHU Saint-Pierre, Faculty of Medicine, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), B1000 Brussels, Belgium
Received 19 December 2013; Revised 6 March 2014; Accepted 11 March 2014; Published 8 April 2014
Academic Editor: Charles Monroe Myer
Copyright © 2014 Jerome R. Lechien et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Abstract
Objectives. The aim of this systematic review is to study the causes of odontogenic chronic maxillary rhinosinusitis (CMRS), the average age of the patients, the distribution by sex, and the teeth involved. Materials and Methods. We performed an EMBASE-, Cochrane-, and PubMed-based review of all of the described cases of odontogenic CMRS from January 1980 to January 2013. Issues of clinical relevance, such as the primary aetiology and the teeth involved, were evaluated for each case. Results. From the 190 identified publications, 23 were selected for a total of 674 patients following inclusion criteria. According to these data, the main cause of odontogenic CMRS is iatrogenic, accounting for 65.7% of the cases. Apical periodontal pathologies (apical granulomas, odontogenic cysts, and apical periodontitis) follow them and account for 25.1% of the cases. The most commonly involved teeth are the first and second molars. Conclusion. Odontogenic CMRS is a common disease that must be suspected whenever a patient undergoing dental treatment presents unilateral maxillary chronic rhinosinusitis.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)